News 

 
Front Page

News

Obituaries

Events

Commentary

Sports

Hometown

Outdoors

Agriculture

Cyberspace

About...

Subscriptions

Local Links
School Board waits to find out financial impact of referendum

By HEATHER CLARK
Special to The Gazette
Stevens Point Area Public School Board members will be down to the wire before they know the financial impact of passing a referendum Nov. 2 to address district space needs.

The School Board voted 7-1 Monday to have two questions on the ballot and also agreed 7-1 on what those questions should entail.

One will ask for about $54 million for capital improvements including classroom additions and remodeling to district buildings and a new Alternative High School building.

The other will request permission to annually exceed revenue caps for operating costs, but there's been no decision yet on a dollar amount.

Ray Haas voted no to each motion; Scott Schultz was not in attendance.

Board members cut about $14.5 million in construction projects from a $68.4 million laundry list of needs.

With the $68.4 million construction, the projected tax rate was $10.35 per $1,000 equalized valuation, which was about 75 cents higher than the existing tax rate of $9.60. With the reduction, the projected rate will drop, but officials couldn't say by how much.

Included in the annual operating costs question is $1 million to keep the district budget high enough that academic programs and athletics would not be threatened. Also in the question is $931,000 for maintenance supplies and utilities associated with new construction, $525,000 for additional custodians as a result of the construction, $500,000 for technology, $250,000 for textbooks and $165,000 for maintenance staff as a result of construction.

About $6 million in maintenance needs not directly related to construction was cut from the initial list of necessary projects. Those needs would be addressed through a long-term maintenance plan that calls for an additional $900,000 annually. Those dollars also are included in the operating costs question.

Modified tax figures presented to the board did not include the $54 million construction loan or the $4.2 million associated with annual recurring operating costs.

Based on piecemeal information presented, recurring annual operating costs could at most boost the tax rate a little more than $1 per $1,000 each year.

More precise amounts for both questions are expected to be provided at next Monday's board meeting.