Government needs to get rid of those "open houses" that are supposed to gather input on public projects Governmental bodies need to get rid of those "open houses" that high-priced consultants have introduced to unveil their designs for public works projects. The "open houses" have become the latest rage, mostly supported by the bureaucrats of the state Department of Transportation. The "open houses" appear designed to diffuse any objections or criticism of specific aspects of a project. Minutes of various "open houses" may list objection and concerns, but they often camouflage the depth of those objections and concerns. On Tuesday, Jan. 16, an "open house" regarding the proposed reconstruction of Church and Division streets between Dixon and Monroe streets will be held from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. in conference room 1 of the Courthouse Annex. Displays of the reconstruction plan, parking alternatives and other items will available, but there will be no formal verbal presentation or question-and-answer period. A hundred people may object to one aspect of the proposal, but the consultants may just note that specific objection among a group of others. Then the objection is passed over by reviewing officials, who see it as just a minor matter. Officials need to return the "public" to public projects. Restore public input by holding public meetings where people can voice their concerns publicly to officials instead of privately. "Open houses" belong in social circles, not for public projects where public input is needed. They leave the impression of "damn the public, full speed ahead with an ill-conceived project." That project may then require costly corrections a few years later, inflicting an additional cost on taxpayers. - Gene Kemmeter